Public Acceptance of Utilization of Water Reuse in Community-Based Sanitation Infrastructure (Case Study: Bandung City)


  • Fajar Lizmawan Water Supply and Sanitation Infrastructure Management Magister Program, Faculty of Civil and Environment Engineering, Insitut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
  • Dyah Wulandari Putri Water and Wastewater Engineering Expertise Group, Faculty of Civil and Environment Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia
  • Sri Maryati Regional and Municipal Infrastructure Systems Expertise Group, School of Architecture, Planning and Policy Development, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia



The difficulty of sustainable development is hampered by water scarcity and increased water demands, particularly in urban areas. Domestic wastewater discharges contaminate surface water bodies, such as the Citarum River. These difficulties, which disproportionately affect low-income populations, contribute to health consequences like diarrhoea and stunting. The Reinvented Toilet Project, a community-based sanitation programme, was put into place in Pasirluyu Village, Bandung, to combat water pollution. In order to lower water demand and sewage generation, it includes water reuse, reusing processed wastewater for other applications. This study assesses Pasirluyu Village infrastructure users' attitudes towards social water reuse. Surveys gathered data on demographics, views on water recycling, and information about sanitary facilities. Spearman correlation tests and descriptive analysis were carried out. The outcomes show that infrastructure users have a positive impression of water reuse. However, some people are hesitant to use reclaimed water for activities that require close personal touch. The relationship between public acceptability of water reuse for flushing toilets and acceptance for other purposes raises the possibility of a cascading expansion of water reuse practises.

Keywords: community-based infrastructure, households, water reuse, water reuse aceptance


K. Kardono, “Condition Of Water Resource In Indonesia And Its Environmental Technology,” J. Air Indones., vol. 3, no. 2, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.29122/jai.v3i2.2331.

I. Nahib et al., “Spatial-Temporal Changes in Water Supply and Demand in the Citarum Watershed, West Java, Indonesia Using a Geospatial Approach,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 562, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su15010562.

H. Tirtomihardjo, “Chapter 10 - Groundwater Environment in Bandung, Indonesia,” 2016, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-803166-7.00010-6.

S. Wangsaatmaja, A. D. Sutadian, and M. A. N. Prasetiati, “A Review of Groundwater Issues in the Bandung Basin, Indonesia: Management and Recommendations,” vol. 6, no. 2, 2006.

A. Hasanawi, I. R. S. Salami, and N. A. Thufailah, “Spatial analysis of health risk due to contamination groundwater resources (a case study in Bandung District, Indonesia),” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1109, no. 1, p. 012074, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1109/1/012074.

Open Data Jabar, “Sungai Citarum,” 2020. [Online]. Available:

A. Rakhmadi, Suharyanto, and A. Nastiti, “Economic Valuation and Potential Pollution Load Analysis of Domestic Wastewater in Greater Bandung,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 1065, no. 1, p. 012028, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1065/1/012028.

M. Haseena, “Water pollution and human health.,” Environ. Risk Assess. Remediat., vol. 1, no. 3, 2017.

L. Lin, H. Yang, and X. Xu, “Effects of Water Pollution on Human Health and Disease Heterogeneity: A Review,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 10, p. 880246, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.880246.

W. Ilahi, Y. Suryati, N. Noviyanti, H. S. Mediani, and F. Rudhiati, “Analisis Pengaruh Wash (Water, Sanitation and Hygiene) terhadap Kejadian Stunting pada Balita,” J. Keperawatan Silampari, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 455–465, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.31539/jks.v6i1.4442.

Q. Wang and Z. Yang, “Industrial water pollution, water environment treatment, and health risks in China,” Environ. Pollut., vol. 218, pp. 358–365, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.011.

M. Yadav and Dharmendra, “A Critical Review on Performance of Wastewater Reuse Systems,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Dev., vol. 4, pp. 233–238, 2014.

M. Al-Saidi, “From Acceptance Snapshots to the Social Acceptability Process: Structuring Knowledge on Attitudes Towards Water Reuse,” Front. Environ. Sci., vol. 9, p. 633841, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021.633841.

R. R. Brown and P. Davies, “Understanding community receptivity to water re-use: Ku-ring-gai Council case study,” Water Sci. Technol., vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 283–290, Feb. 2007, doi: 10.2166/wst.2007.119.

M. Michetti, M. Raggi, E. Guerra, and D. Viaggi, “Interpreting Farmers’ Perceptions of Risks and Benefits Concerning Wastewater Reuse for Irrigation: A Case Study in Emilia-Romagna (Italy),” Water, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 108, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.3390/w11010108.

D. Segura, V. Carrillo, F. Remonsellez, M. Araya, and G. Vidal, “Comparison of Public Perception in Desert and Rainy Regions of Chile Regarding the Reuse of Treated Sewage Water,” Water, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 334, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.3390/w10030334.

Z. Zhu, A. Li, and H. Wang, “Public perception and acceptability of reclaimed water: the case of Shandong province, China,” J. Water Reuse Desalination, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 308–330, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.2166/wrd.2017.022.

L. Garcia-Cuerva, E. Z. Berglund, and A. R. Binder, “Public perceptions of water shortages, conservation behaviors, and support for water reuse in the U.S.,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 113, pp. 106–115, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.006.

Q. Gu, Y. Chen, R. Pody, R. Cheng, X. Zheng, and Z. Zhang, “Public perception and acceptability toward reclaimed water in Tianjin,” Resour. Conserv. Recycl., vol. 104, pp. 291–299, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.07.013.




How to Cite

Lizmawan, F., Putri, D. W., & Maryati, S. (2023). Public Acceptance of Utilization of Water Reuse in Community-Based Sanitation Infrastructure (Case Study: Bandung City). Jurnal Sains Dan Kesehatan, 5(5), 829–836.